Page 2 of 2

Rodeo very wet boat but made to play in those features

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:10 pm
by Wendy
I have Viper 11 and had a Rodeo. Loved the Rodeo, but was too wet for using as a down river boat for me. I didn't have a pump. Loved the light weight.
If this doesn't make sense I broke my ankle and foot and am in an altered state of consciousness for pain relief. I hoped such misfortune would bring everyone else in the SE rain.

Re: differance?

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:32 am
by sbroam
madmike wrote:can anyone expand on the difference between the Viper 11, and the Rodeo?
About a foot?

http://www.mohawkcanoes.com/whitewater.htm

It just looked like a small Viper to me, but never paddled one. Not sure if it was an actual Frankie boat or if they just took a Viper and chopped it.

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:32 am
by c1swim
Ya, it's a foot shorter, but has .5" more rocker and a half inch more narrow. So, it is less edgy the chine is not as long. It's made to play in a hole. Not a fast boat, but it is light, Royalite. The old ones were only available in Royalite. However, when I talked with Mohawk the other day, the new ones are only in Royalex. for now.

mohawk

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:36 am
by madmike
Thanx, I read everything on Mohawk's site, and I am gonna call them. I just wanted some thoughts from paddlers who might know something.

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:57 pm
by ClassFive Boats
Just for info sake, the viper series goes liike this.. mohawk took a viper 12 and removed 1 foot from the middle, put the two halves back together and made it a viper11, then did the same thing again and made a viper 10 or "rodeo". Ive seen the original plugs and you can see the seams where each were cut and put back together . At 220 lbs., I paddled a viper 11 for years and it did just fine. Now in a mega rocker C1 .

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:52 am
by sbroam
That's what I thought - the edge must have been more sharply defined in the center and less so towards the ends, thus the reduced edge in the subsequent "chops".

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:02 am
by ClassFive Boats
thats right. the 12 was edge'er than the 11, and the 11 was edge'er than the rodeo.

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:18 pm
by Randy Dodson
Mike, I'm just curious as to why you want the new boat to be Royalex?

Seems like a Spanish Fly would be great for what you're looking for. I've got two friends who paddle the Fly at over 215# and do great in them.

I paddled the 'fly once

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:37 pm
by madmike
It was fun, just not what I want. Where do you get one? I have a bunch of royalex, and it works well.

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:00 pm
by Open Gate
pdown2 wrote: You just can't beat a bathtub boat.......they absolutely SUCK in big water though.......or I just absolutely suck in big water, one of the two and probably the latter.
They DO suck in big water, too slow, too low (sides and in the water...).

I manage to run big water Class IV's in my CU fly to get to a play feature but it's truly hair paddling, or very exciting stuff (all relative to your intentions/state of mind...) poping an ender when you're not expecting it in the middle of a juicy rapid :roll:

But I'll keep at the small boats just for their playability :D