I used to think that having a bigger engine meant less relative penalty for carrying stuff on the roof, since the mileage would only drop 1 or 2 mpg versus 5 to 8 with smaller cars. Then I did the math.
F-150: 16mpg, 13 mpg with boats. 19% decrease
Mazda 5: 26mpg, 21 mpg with boats. 19% decrease
Subaru: 25 mpg, 20 mpg with boats. 20% decrease
In general, it seems that a roof rack with gear on it means a 20% increase in fuel consumption regardless of the car. All of the numbers I used above were comparing a bare rack to rack with gear. With no rack, the change is 25% across the board.
Best way to Carry Boats for MPG
Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin
- ohioboater
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:05 pm
- Location: SE Ohio
- Contact: