kaz... thanks man... but you could make a cast iron bathtub look like a good boat. (Hey... there's another class we can add at Nationals!!!

I'll run it by my Rep's) I look forward to a weekend on the Gauley or ??? when we can trade the Inferno for the L'edge.
Dooleyoc-1... I hope so buddy. We'll have to see though. At the least... I'll have a prototype there. If I can't come (for some reason) Roy will have it with him for you to jump into. I gotta see how this whole messed up hand deal plays out first. I think a cast iron bathtub would be fun on the green... as long as it doesn't have the claw feet still attached. Kaz said the L'edge was stable... REALLY stable.
sbroam... I can see Kaz and I co-conspiring on something in the future. Should be really odd looking.
sganarelle... huh? It doesn't even have grab loops on it at the moment.

Don't fret... production versions will have plenty of bells and whistles... and possibly a bull-horn and microphone.
jrsh92... the Nitro is probably faster in a straight line. I think the Zoom might be a touch faster than the L'edge as well... but I'll let Martin Talbot compare them as Martin has spent more time in the Zoom and he paddled the L'edge here in Wausau.
Here's a few of my own thought's on "hull speed".
It's great to have hull speed but for the most part it's not always the deal breaker in regards to me liking a boat or not. I'll confess... I'm actually a fairly lazy paddler when I can be and I always try to let the water do the bulk of the work. I'll often times search out the greatest concentration of current (green water) to propel myself or catch the blade in. I actually can
turn it on when I have to though....
"uh oh... time for a boof stroke" 
A Spark for example has loads of hull speed but for the average boater at times that speed means missing eddies or not being able to turn the boat quickly and easily. It doesn't mean the boat can't... it just goes
really fast better. For creeking or running drops/slides/etc. I don't always find speed necessary as sometimes going with the rivers flow and throwing in a few quick powerful tugs on the paddle at the right time yields more positive results. My favorite boat (SpanishFly) really does lack speed at certain times when you
really wish it had more of it... but for the most part it isn't needed for running a drop or steep ledges with fast moving water. It's those times that you
have to have a bit more speed that made me deviate away from copying the SPFly's rocker profile completely.
So... If a boat has too much speed (typically less rocker) and not enough speed (typically lot's of rocker) you often compromise a bit of the boats turning ability for getting in and out of those tight spots when creeking or running tight and technical rivers. Finding a balance between these two things is really a challenge... especially with nine feet to work with.
I feel as though every boat's platform and length combined with it's own intended uses needs to find it's own
ideal hull speed and turning ability. Each time you move one direction... you lose a bit going the other direction. As it stands I feel that this boat has fairly good overall hull speed for it's length and very good turning ability considering how much rocker it lacks in it's midsection. The L'edge is faster than the SpanishFly in a straight line or accelerating on the flats or in the green water. The SpanishFly would most likely beat it an "into and back out of" the eddy competition. The L'edge is far drier. It has more volume. It will be less taxing on your body after long stretches of flatwater... and for those of you that asked for it... it actually
looks like a canoe. Oh... and you won't wear it out after a season or two of bouncing it down and off of rocks.
Sorry for the redundant ramblings... does any of this make sense?
Maybe I'll condense this after I've read it a few times.
