Roof Racks for new vehicles

Decked Canoes, Open Canoes, as long as they're canoes!

Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin

User avatar
the great gonzo
Paddling Benefactor
Posts: 1718
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Montréal, Québec

Post by the great gonzo »

I got a Toyota Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab with the 4cylinder engine and a manual transmission. Flawless after 50000 miles. Got a cap on top and 78" Thule racks.
I can sleep in the back (6'2" bed).
The rack holds 6 canoes on their side no problems.
Mileage is depending on load, speeds and time of the year between 22 and 28 mpg.
Highly recommended vehicle

TGG!
Everyone must believe in something. I believe I'll go canoeing - Henry David Thoreau
jim gross
CBoats Addict
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: sterling,va
Contact:

Julie

Post by jim gross »

Julie,

You could always purchase with what ever manufacturers rack is on there. Then go to the guys out by the Tygart Arden section and have them fabricate an attachment. Easy peasy Japaneasy. ;-)

Jim
Stingray
C Guru
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:14 pm
Location: NY

Post by Stingray »

A van might be a good ride for you
Good luck partner!!!
JulieKeller.com
Pain Boater
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:24 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Re: New Car

Post by JulieKeller.com »

Bill M wrote:Julie, Check out the Toyota Rav 4. Gabi had one hauled 2 oc's and slept in it. Not sure about the instrument fitting tho.
Bill
Hi Bill!

I went to the Toyota dealer today to try the Highlander and came home liking the RAV4 better than the Highlander. The 4 cyl RAV4 gets $4500 on the Cash for Clunkers program and I was amazed that I wasn't driving a 6 cyl. The cello fits!
User avatar
TonyB
CBoats Addict
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:06 am
Location: Hatfield, PA

Post by TonyB »

Ive a few friends that swear by thefront wheel drive honda Element.
Proud Yankee
User avatar
Marc Evans
C Guru
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pullman, Washington

Post by Marc Evans »

Hi Julie:

I'm going to third the Rav if it fits you. I've got the V6, which almost has too much power, but does haul the gear. Just returned from a week on the Main Salmon and hauled a trailer with a cataraft, all the necessary gear and food for a week, a kayak, my spanishfly and four people. Hardly felt the load. Mileage dropped to about 20 mpg with all this stuff, but is normally around 28-29 mpg on the road and about 18 mpg for purely around town.

I have put a 17 foot canoe on top, but you will have a hard time finding a place to anchor the bow line. Let me know if you find a good spot to anchor the bow line. I have placed a spanishfly and a LL Remix (C1) on top without a problem.

I have a friend who had an older Subaru Forester and we had put a single tripping canoe on top. Can't recall if we ever put two up there, or if it is possible. The new Foresters are considerably larger and should hold a bit more. My friend liked his (his daughter has it now) and it has been very reliable. He now uses a Tacoma (4 door) with a V6. I suppose that this is similar to what The Great Gonzo is describing, but the V6 gas mileage is disappointing. We got about 15-16 mpg when travelling to the Boundary Waters with 3 people, two tripping canoes and all the gear for two weeks. The 4 cylinder is a much more efficient way to go.

Marc
User avatar
sbroam
CBoats.net Staff
Posts: 3969
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:12 am
Location: Lexington, SC
Contact:

Post by sbroam »

At OC Nats last year, we looked at Gabi's Rav 4 - nice. We also discussed the lack of tie downs on the front and suggested an old trick I'd seen somewhere and used on a Saturn we had once. Under the hood, locate a bolt near the edge and front that you can back out - use it to secure a climbing chock (?) :

[img]http://www.needlesports.com/nutsmuseum/ ... sterxs.jpg[/img]

You can pull this up from under the hood and use as a tie down or tuck it under when not in use. Use a couple of inches of tubular webbing to protect your paint. Set up one each side. Worked fine for me.
Bill M
C Guru
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:00 pm
Location: Guntersville, Al

Rav 4

Post by Bill M »

They also can take a lick. Gabi got rear ended by someone running 55 while she was stopped at a light. She walked away from it but is having some serious back problems now. The back of the car crumpled up to the passenger compartment which remained intact.
Bill
cbcboat
CBoats Addict
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: Montana

Post by cbcboat »

Just a note, have seen a lot of post saying they put X amount of boats on top of specific vehicles--any vehicle can carry multiple boats as long as you have the long bars for the rack. Its not a matter of the vehicle being capable of hauling the boats, its a matter of the rack being capable of hauling the boats. A Geo Metro can carry as many boats as a truck, if the bars are long enough.
B
jscottl67
CBoats Addict
Posts: 446
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Chattanooga TN

Post by jscottl67 »

cbcboat wrote:Just a note, have seen a lot of post saying they put X amount of boats on top of specific vehicles--any vehicle can carry multiple boats as long as you have the long bars for the rack.....
B
A lot of the posts are stating the gas mileage while driving with X boats loaded and/or how they handled the load. A couple of RX touring boats and camping gear make a difference, esp. if you have a 5 hour drive to good water like some of us peeps do. I'd throw a couple of boats on a Metro to go 10 miles to the put in or run shuttle, wouldn't want it for a 300 mile trip.

Just my 2¢ ;)
JulieKeller.com
Pain Boater
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:24 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Post by JulieKeller.com »

cbcboat wrote:Just a note, have seen a lot of post saying they put X amount of boats on top of specific vehicles--any vehicle can carry multiple boats as long as you have the long bars for the rack. Its not a matter of the vehicle being capable of hauling the boats, its a matter of the rack being capable of hauling the boats. A Geo Metro can carry as many boats as a truck, if the bars are long enough.
B
Not exactly - it is really a matter of - can you get long bars on the vehicle that are far enough apart to support the load. The only way to put long bars on the 2010 Outback is to have the bars 21" apart. A 21 inch bar spacing is not really enough for a 16 foot canoe.
JulieKeller.com
Pain Boater
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:24 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Post by JulieKeller.com »

jscottl67 wrote: lot of the posts are stating the gas mileage while driving with X boats loaded and/or how they handled the load. A couple of RX touring boats and camping gear make a difference, esp. if you have a 5 hour drive to good water like some of us peeps do. I'd throw a couple of boats on a Metro to go 10 miles to the put in or run shuttle, wouldn't want it for a 300 mile trip.

Just my 2¢ ;)
I really don't care much about gas mileage other than that the vehicle needs to have good enough mileage to qualify for the cash for clunkers program.
JulieKeller.com
Pain Boater
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 1:24 pm
Location: Reston, VA

Post by JulieKeller.com »

milkman wrote:I'd add another vote for a Forester. I haul two (side by side) to three (third on top of the side by side) solo canoes every weekend on mine and occasionally two tandems (one stacked leaning against the other). My Forester is a 2005 and was pictured in American Whitewater with three canoes on top. I get around 25 mpg on the highway with canoes and about 30 mpg without. I'm 5''ll" and have slept comfortably in the car. Don't know about the cello, but I can get a 60" paddle at a diagonal in the back without lowering the rear seat. Car has been really reliable for 60,000 miles now. It's one downfall is that it pings under load. I've had it checked out by two mechanics--neither could find anything wrong. I now run the car on premium gas and it doesn't ping.
I just test drove the Forester. The regular was very sluggish but the turbo was acceptable. The cello won't fit without putting the back seat down. I can't believe how you can sleep in the Forester - I'm 5'2'' and it would be possible but a tight fit to sleep in the Forester. The 2010 Forester does not have the new roof rack and you can put a yakima with at least a 37 inch spread.
jscottl67
CBoats Addict
Posts: 446
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Chattanooga TN

Post by jscottl67 »

It wasn't my primary concern either, but getting better than the roughly 12 mpg my buddy gets on his landcruiser when loaded is nice when you have a 600+ mile round trip.
User avatar
Craig Smerda
L'Edge Designer
Posts: 2815
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 3:59 am
Location: WaUSAu Wisconsin USA North America Earth, etc.

Post by Craig Smerda »

call me cheap... i picked this one (family expander) up in Ohio for $6300 in January... 300HP AWD... averaged 72mph on the way home and still pulled 27mpg. i can't afford nor would i buy a "new" car again... too much depreciation and i'd rather "recycle"

Image

i've still gotta get some roof racks for it though :roll:

(btw... the vintage "made in USA" Huffy bike hangin' in the garage... that's been saved from the dump for our little one someday... and Kaz get's to use it when he's here in town... he brings his own basket and bell though... won't leave them for her?)
Post Reply