Fast kayaks for potential conversion?
Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin
- sbroam
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:12 am
- Location: Lexington, SC
- Contact:
By all means - an Atom will be a step up from the Gyramax, though the ones I have tried have been on the heavy side. Maybe not as fast in a straight line than the Gyramax, but a more current design.
C-Boats Moderator
http://picasaweb.google.com/scott.broam/CanoeOutfitting
http://picasaweb.google.com/scott.broam/CanoeOutfitting
I'm thinking that's probably a good step up... from all accounts the Atom isn't a slow boat which is what really matters... while I'd love to get out on whitewater every week, I am 2 minutes from the closest lake and I go there to get in paddling time whenever possible, and practice rolls, etc... It's just too much of a slog to paddle, say, a 6 foot playboat across a lake for me to be motivated to get out and do it... and that boat would be slower as a C-1.
The Atom seems to have more rocker than the Gyramax (which has roughly no rocker) and at 3 feet shorter is probably maneuverable enough to take down pretty serious whitewater with practice-- the Gyramax is limited simply because I can't turn it around. If it's reasonably fast for it's size the length and the edges should make it both a more interesting paddle and functional on more technical water. I'm going to contact the guy selling the Atom about it and see if I can work this out.
The Atom seems to have more rocker than the Gyramax (which has roughly no rocker) and at 3 feet shorter is probably maneuverable enough to take down pretty serious whitewater with practice-- the Gyramax is limited simply because I can't turn it around. If it's reasonably fast for it's size the length and the edges should make it both a more interesting paddle and functional on more technical water. I'm going to contact the guy selling the Atom about it and see if I can work this out.
-
- C Maven
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Northern California
jrsh92:
insolence:
i'm gonna have to disagree
TheKrikkitWars:
Any WW boat will suck on a lake.It's just too much of a slog to paddle, say, a 6 foot playboat across a lake for me to be motivated to get out and do it... and that boat would be slower as a C-1.
insolence:
but if a whitewater boat is wanted, try the finkenmeister from robson - better than any conversion ever can be
i'm gonna have to disagree
TheKrikkitWars:
Really? I like the looks of those hulls, but thought they might be a little too much on the displacement side of things. ie; lacking primary stabililty. Don't know anyone who has tried one.Wavesport Habitiat (not amazingly fast, but a boat thats considered to be a better converted than as a kayak; might help you get one cheap),
Larry
- TheKrikkitWars
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:27 am
- Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Contact:
I've paddled one and enjoyed it and I know I'm not alone in having liked it:Larry Horne wrote: TheKrikkitWars:Really? I like the looks of those hulls, but thought they might be a little too much on the displacement side of things. ie; lacking primary stabililty. Don't know anyone who has tried one.Wavesport Habitiat (not amazingly fast, but a boat thats considered to be a better converted than as a kayak; might help you get one cheap),
Its a lot better than the Nomad or Jefe for primary stability, seems to be because the back 1/3 has quite defined chine/rail thingies.
This said personally I can't see why more C1ers don't go down the displacment hulled route.
Joshua Kelly - "More George Smiley than James Bond"
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
- marclamenace
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:28 pm
- Location: Quebec, Canada
Nice thread... and picture Joshua!
Anybody has a web resource on what is exactly water displacement (VS other types) hull? I would like to know a little more... Maybe I have to start a new topic?
I always thought of it a something between round and flat bottom, regardless of what the chines looks like...?
I that way I would think of my Remix of being a water displacement hull, with quite soft chines, would that makes sense?
Anybody has a web resource on what is exactly water displacement (VS other types) hull? I would like to know a little more... Maybe I have to start a new topic?
I always thought of it a something between round and flat bottom, regardless of what the chines looks like...?
I that way I would think of my Remix of being a water displacement hull, with quite soft chines, would that makes sense?
Watch out; that river has rocks on the bottom.
- TheKrikkitWars
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:27 am
- Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Contact:
Planing hulls are generally flat (or sometimes concave to encourage cavitation) in order to plane over fast water,
Displacement seems to be a definition for pretty much everything else. The remix is funny because it has the defined rails traditionaly found in planing hulls, but it's made of two curves of vastly differing radii, rather than a flat and curve giving it very odd charicteristics
I should add that the picture isn't me but Ben McKeown, Probably britains gnarliest C1'er paddling his Habitat in Vietnam.
Displacement seems to be a definition for pretty much everything else. The remix is funny because it has the defined rails traditionaly found in planing hulls, but it's made of two curves of vastly differing radii, rather than a flat and curve giving it very odd charicteristics
I should add that the picture isn't me but Ben McKeown, Probably britains gnarliest C1'er paddling his Habitat in Vietnam.
Joshua Kelly - "More George Smiley than James Bond"
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
-
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:06 pm
- Location: Augsburg (Bavaria)/ Southern Germany
- Contact:
hey Larry Horne, you disagree about the Finkenmeister
. please tell me why!
Any better ideas?
It's that I love the Finkenmeister, but am looking for alternatives since this boat is just huge. So I'm not sure wether it makes the best joyce smaller persons as an ready-to-rescue-the-devil's-grandmother-from-hades creekboat.
My Kendo Ev is great but for future I'd like something slightly bigger, bit more chines, lot's of speed and responsivity that corresponds well with my technical slalom paddling style
The remix feels not bad, but it didn't make me fall in love with neither
The atom - maybe, I will test one the next time I can find one
but the Gyramax? I don't know, it's really very, very long. Probably one must be very familiar with it to ride it well
. please tell me why!
Any better ideas?
It's that I love the Finkenmeister, but am looking for alternatives since this boat is just huge. So I'm not sure wether it makes the best joyce smaller persons as an ready-to-rescue-the-devil's-grandmother-from-hades creekboat.
My Kendo Ev is great but for future I'd like something slightly bigger, bit more chines, lot's of speed and responsivity that corresponds well with my technical slalom paddling style
The remix feels not bad, but it didn't make me fall in love with neither
The atom - maybe, I will test one the next time I can find one
but the Gyramax? I don't know, it's really very, very long. Probably one must be very familiar with it to ride it well
it's gettin hot
I MAKE THE WATER BURN
purple orange flames
blaze where I put my paddle
I MAKE THE WATER BURN
purple orange flames
blaze where I put my paddle
-
- C Maven
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Northern California
well you started it! you're the one that said it's "better than any conversion ever can be"hey Larry Horne, you disagree about the Finkenmeister
. please tell me why!
Any better ideas?
I only spent a few minutes in a fink, but what i found was;
1. it didn't have enough initial stability for me. I like initial stability AND secondary stability. I am much more confident, and thus can paddle better if I don't have to worry about flipping in silly water. I just don't have good enough balance for that type of boat.
2. tiny cockpit. I hate that.
3. too long and pointy. Deck is too high.
4. from what i've witnessed, it takes more work to get the Fink outfitting dialed than just doing a conversion from scratch.
5. (and this is big one) they look funny
Medium or small Burn or H3Any better ideas?
Larry
-
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:06 pm
- Location: Augsburg (Bavaria)/ Southern Germany
- Contact:
oh yeah, it's ugly, that's right - the shape ok, it is functional but with this awful red-yellow thing (or red-black) they've got going, no way ;)
but for the ultimate thrill in beauty, elegance and style I'd recommend a slalom OC1 anyway (just not the flowerpot ones like CUfly, Spanish Fly or Quake)
allright, I got your point.
hm, I was ok with initial stability and cockpit size.
when I rode it, it felt so good, as if it were just meant for someone paddling my style. Even more than my 'til that day near-perfect Kendo conversion.
just - it was so big, so I'm not sure wether in hard water it would provide the fast and direct reactions to my movements I wish to get from my boat. If they had it one or two sizes smaller, I'd buy it immediately, but this way I need to look for something else
but for the ultimate thrill in beauty, elegance and style I'd recommend a slalom OC1 anyway (just not the flowerpot ones like CUfly, Spanish Fly or Quake)
allright, I got your point.
hm, I was ok with initial stability and cockpit size.
when I rode it, it felt so good, as if it were just meant for someone paddling my style. Even more than my 'til that day near-perfect Kendo conversion.
just - it was so big, so I'm not sure wether in hard water it would provide the fast and direct reactions to my movements I wish to get from my boat. If they had it one or two sizes smaller, I'd buy it immediately, but this way I need to look for something else
it's gettin hot
I MAKE THE WATER BURN
purple orange flames
blaze where I put my paddle
I MAKE THE WATER BURN
purple orange flames
blaze where I put my paddle
- the great gonzo
- Paddling Benefactor
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:03 am
- Location: Montréal, Québec
Hmm, I don't know. Never paddled a Burn or an H3, but I tried an Everest coversion a while ago, and I gladly handed it back to it's owner and hopped back into my FM. It wasn't any more stable, was WAY slower, didn't pivot and narrow cockpit sucked. It didn't even offer better maneuvrability than the finkenmeister, despite being significantly shorter.Larry Horne wrote:well you started it! you're the one that said it's "better than any conversion ever can be"hey Larry Horne, you disagree about the Finkenmeister
. please tell me why!
Any better ideas?
I only spent a few minutes in a fink, but what i found was;
1. it didn't have enough initial stability for me. I like initial stability AND secondary stability. I am much more confident, and thus can paddle better if I don't have to worry about flipping in silly water. I just don't have good enough balance for that type of boat.
2. tiny cockpit. I hate that.
3. too long and pointy. Deck is too high.
4. from what i've witnessed, it takes more work to get the Fink outfitting dialed than just doing a conversion from scratch.
5. (and this is big one) they look funny
Medium or small Burn or H3Any better ideas?
I have yet to find a conversion I wouldf take over my Finkenmeister.
Everyone must believe in something. I believe I'll go canoeing - Henry David Thoreau
-
- C Maven
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Northern California
- the great gonzo
- Paddling Benefactor
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:03 am
- Location: Montréal, Québec
Don't know too many rivers yet, I just moved to the Loops 3 days ago.
But I had a look at the Adams (less than oner hour away while driving here, and that one still has water. So does the Illecillewaet in Revelstoke (2 hours) and as far as I ma told the Thompson and the Clearwater are still good to go, too.
TGG!
But I had a look at the Adams (less than oner hour away while driving here, and that one still has water. So does the Illecillewaet in Revelstoke (2 hours) and as far as I ma told the Thompson and the Clearwater are still good to go, too.
TGG!
Everyone must believe in something. I believe I'll go canoeing - Henry David Thoreau
-
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:40 pm
- Location: Atlanta
- the great gonzo
- Paddling Benefactor
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 2:03 am
- Location: Montréal, Québec
I actually find particularly the stern design brilliant.
Just low enough to sink it a tad to do shallow pivot turns.
Enough volume not to do full stern enders, but to sink the stern just enough into the green water to help push the boat through that big hole.
TGG!
Just low enough to sink it a tad to do shallow pivot turns.
Enough volume not to do full stern enders, but to sink the stern just enough into the green water to help push the boat through that big hole.
TGG!
Everyone must believe in something. I believe I'll go canoeing - Henry David Thoreau