Old or New Probe 13
Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin
Old or New Probe 13
Hi,
I am looking to get into OC-1ing from kayaking, and have settled on the Probe 13 as the boat for me. I was getting ready to buy a new one, but then I came across a "new" Probe 12 (the current model 13) that had been sitting in a local shop's wharehouse since 2001. I am going to check it out in person this weekend.
The older boat outfitted would cost $200 more than the newer boat outfitted and shipped from Mohawk.
Here is my quandry. I have heard of all the issues surrounding the new royalex boats, but have also heard that royalex stiffens and becomes brittle over time to a point where a boat sitting on a shelf for the better part of a decade may have lost some of it's durability. So would the older boat with the older material still be preferable to a new royalex boat, especially given the high price? Has there been any design advances in the Probe series over that time frame that might make the newer boat more desirable?
Also, does anyone know what Mohawk's outfitting was like circa 2001?
Thanks,
Kyle
I am looking to get into OC-1ing from kayaking, and have settled on the Probe 13 as the boat for me. I was getting ready to buy a new one, but then I came across a "new" Probe 12 (the current model 13) that had been sitting in a local shop's wharehouse since 2001. I am going to check it out in person this weekend.
The older boat outfitted would cost $200 more than the newer boat outfitted and shipped from Mohawk.
Here is my quandry. I have heard of all the issues surrounding the new royalex boats, but have also heard that royalex stiffens and becomes brittle over time to a point where a boat sitting on a shelf for the better part of a decade may have lost some of it's durability. So would the older boat with the older material still be preferable to a new royalex boat, especially given the high price? Has there been any design advances in the Probe series over that time frame that might make the newer boat more desirable?
Also, does anyone know what Mohawk's outfitting was like circa 2001?
Thanks,
Kyle
I am not an expert in such things and don't take my word for it, but I think "new" royalex may actually be older than 2001... the oldest royalex-- the first few iterations of it-- would be back in the 70's. Again, I don't know for sure, but I have a feeling that "newer" royalex could refer to late 90's-- maybe even earlier than that? It's possible that the used boat was in fact not made of a higher quality material in the first place, and if someone else can confirm that I'd definitely say go with the new one.
If it was indeed manufactured with better materials, though, I don't know what the effects of aging, etc would be on it.
If it was indeed manufactured with better materials, though, I don't know what the effects of aging, etc would be on it.
- yarnellboat
- C Maven
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
- Contact:
- yarnellboat
- C Maven
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
- Contact:
Sorry Wiggins, I mis-read and thought there was an actual new Probe 12 (i.e., 12II) in the consideration; didn't realize both boats were 13' Probes.
Stored in a warehouse, the older boat's Royalex shouldn't be a problem age-wise, but I don't think it'll be the old-school bomber stuff. Some might argue that the aging will have helped stiffen it somewhat, compared to brand new Royalex.
Personally, I wouldn't pay $200 more for an old boat when I could get a new one for less. It's not only the hull that has aged, but also the air bags and adhesive outfitting-wise. If there's any problems, you might be more likely to get good customer service buying new from Mohawk than you are clearing out somebody's warehouse?
You could also look and see what Probes are available at Western Canoeing in Abbotsford - they make composite ones, but often seem to have Roayalex around too:
http://www.westerncanoekayak.com/home/S ... Canoes.pdf
Let us know if you ever come north of the border:
http://paddlenet.myfastforum.org/
Pat.
Stored in a warehouse, the older boat's Royalex shouldn't be a problem age-wise, but I don't think it'll be the old-school bomber stuff. Some might argue that the aging will have helped stiffen it somewhat, compared to brand new Royalex.
Personally, I wouldn't pay $200 more for an old boat when I could get a new one for less. It's not only the hull that has aged, but also the air bags and adhesive outfitting-wise. If there's any problems, you might be more likely to get good customer service buying new from Mohawk than you are clearing out somebody's warehouse?
You could also look and see what Probes are available at Western Canoeing in Abbotsford - they make composite ones, but often seem to have Roayalex around too:
http://www.westerncanoekayak.com/home/S ... Canoes.pdf
Let us know if you ever come north of the border:
http://paddlenet.myfastforum.org/
Pat.
Based on my experience with Mad River and Old Town Royalex, they are not "brittle" at ten years old. Twenty years or more and you might want to think twice about hard use.
My Mad River Synergy was a bit "soft" when new in 1998. Tying the ropes down hard would leave very shallow dents in the Royalex, but they disappeared with time. Now, ten+ years old, it shows no sign of being brittle.
Any ten year old Royalex boat that has not been hammered and scraped is likely to be a good buy.
My Mad River Synergy was a bit "soft" when new in 1998. Tying the ropes down hard would leave very shallow dents in the Royalex, but they disappeared with time. Now, ten+ years old, it shows no sign of being brittle.
Any ten year old Royalex boat that has not been hammered and scraped is likely to be a good buy.
- Mr.DeadLegs
- CBoats Addict
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:31 pm
- Location: Marietta, Georgia
Pat,
Between my girlfriend, the Chilliwack, the Chehalis, and the Thompson I am up north of the border quite a bit. It was actually seeing canoers on the Chehalis last spring that got me thinking about OC-1ing.
The older canoe is the one on sale at Western Canoe and Kayak. After putting end bags in it, the exchange rate, banking fees, import charge, etc. the end price comes out to just over $1700. Assuming that I have to pay the high end of Mohawk's shipping estimate on their website I would pay $1510 for a new Probe 13. The only reason I can see to buy the older boat would be if the material was better, and it seems the general consensus here is that it is not.
Richard,
I'll give you a call about the 12 footer vs 13 footer. I am mostly on medium to high volume rivers, but run the odd class IV creek. The Skykomish River, the Sauk River, the upper Green River Gorge (in Wa.), and the Wenatchee River are all my standard fare. I am starting to get into overnight trips such as the Rogue River Wilderness run, and hades's Canyon on the Snake. My ultimate goal in canoeing is to run the Grand Canyon. From kayaking I know that I am a river runner, not a playboater, so the loss in performance by going from the 12 to the 13 did not concern me. If I will be happier in the long run going with the shorter boat I don't mind the steeper learning curve. Basically I am looking for a all round river runner with some storage space.
Thanks again,
Kyle
Between my girlfriend, the Chilliwack, the Chehalis, and the Thompson I am up north of the border quite a bit. It was actually seeing canoers on the Chehalis last spring that got me thinking about OC-1ing.
The older canoe is the one on sale at Western Canoe and Kayak. After putting end bags in it, the exchange rate, banking fees, import charge, etc. the end price comes out to just over $1700. Assuming that I have to pay the high end of Mohawk's shipping estimate on their website I would pay $1510 for a new Probe 13. The only reason I can see to buy the older boat would be if the material was better, and it seems the general consensus here is that it is not.
Richard,
I'll give you a call about the 12 footer vs 13 footer. I am mostly on medium to high volume rivers, but run the odd class IV creek. The Skykomish River, the Sauk River, the upper Green River Gorge (in Wa.), and the Wenatchee River are all my standard fare. I am starting to get into overnight trips such as the Rogue River Wilderness run, and hades's Canyon on the Snake. My ultimate goal in canoeing is to run the Grand Canyon. From kayaking I know that I am a river runner, not a playboater, so the loss in performance by going from the 12 to the 13 did not concern me. If I will be happier in the long run going with the shorter boat I don't mind the steeper learning curve. Basically I am looking for a all round river runner with some storage space.
Thanks again,
Kyle
- yarnellboat
- C Maven
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Winnipeg
- Contact:
Kyle,
Since you're an experienced kayaker, I'd think maybe you'd prefer a more responsive boat - aside from the length difference, the Probe 12 is a bit finer-tuned than the 13, so would be a bit more fun for catching eddies etc. I'm not sure if you have any OC experience, but in the world of ww solo canoes, a Probe 12 is still a very predictable, stable boat, not a scary learning curve.
Maybe see you up here sometime, you know where to find us, some class II-III canoeing pics from Vanc here FYI:
http://picasaweb.google.com/Beaver.Canoe.Club
And you probably know of Paddle Trails in Seattle.
Good luck,
Pat.
Since you're an experienced kayaker, I'd think maybe you'd prefer a more responsive boat - aside from the length difference, the Probe 12 is a bit finer-tuned than the 13, so would be a bit more fun for catching eddies etc. I'm not sure if you have any OC experience, but in the world of ww solo canoes, a Probe 12 is still a very predictable, stable boat, not a scary learning curve.
Maybe see you up here sometime, you know where to find us, some class II-III canoeing pics from Vanc here FYI:
http://picasaweb.google.com/Beaver.Canoe.Club
And you probably know of Paddle Trails in Seattle.
Good luck,
Pat.
Pat,
Thanks for the tip. I am starting to rethink the length of the boat. If I ever manage to wake up early enough this week I'll have to call Mohawk (night shifts suck!).
I have next to no OC-1 experience outside of playing around in flatwater canoes on a canal next to my dad's cabin. Not exactly what I would call good practice.
I'll let you know when I am heading north!
Kyle
Thanks for the tip. I am starting to rethink the length of the boat. If I ever manage to wake up early enough this week I'll have to call Mohawk (night shifts suck!).
I have next to no OC-1 experience outside of playing around in flatwater canoes on a canal next to my dad's cabin. Not exactly what I would call good practice.
I'll let you know when I am heading north!
Kyle
In my opinion I think that the 13 would be the best fit for your needs and future plans. The few time I have used one for an overnighter I love it. I could pack more than just a bivey sack and beans. I have only boat one one big water once, (remember I like creeks) I found the boat to be very responsive. and I think that the extra gear capiciaty is well worth the little extra lenght. But I can also say if your a make do kind of guy (like beans and rice) the 12 maybe the boat of choice If you plan on creek,n (southeasten boys version of huge water). The 13 is drier holds more gear. I would go for the 13. Hope this helps Feel free to call me. My cell is 423 902 8014 just not after 11 pm or before 6 am (my girlfriend anit as physced about canoes as me) i will call you back in a few mins. I promise.
Richard Guin
Lazy good for nothing slacker
Lazy good for nothing slacker