Edgey creekers: Octane 85 vs fly?

Decked Canoes, Open Canoes, as long as they're canoes!

Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin

Post Reply
User avatar
GSG
Pain Boater
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:34 pm
Location: Vancouver Island, BC.

Edgey creekers: Octane 85 vs fly?

Post by GSG »

Just curious if anyone has paddled both these boats and could comment on which would be the better creeker. Is the 85 generally considered TOO edgey for class IV+ creeking?
Wendy
Paddling Benefactor
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 3:02 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Edgey creekers: Octane 85 vs fly?

Post by Wendy »

I don't paddle 4 plus but the edges on the 85 will grab on rocks, especially compared to the Spanish Fly. The Option is BF creek boat
DougB
CBoats Addict
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Edgey creekers: Octane 85 vs fly?

Post by DougB »

I'm also interested in comparisons as well as experience on how the 85 runs with a 220 lb weight. I would love an edgier & dryer fly in my next boat!
Wendy
Paddling Benefactor
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 3:02 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Edgey creekers: Octane 85 vs fly?

Post by Wendy »

I use to weigh 220 :roll: When I did I found the 91 to be a much dryer Octane for me than the 85. The 85 is a great boat. Look at Jeremy's descriptions- river runner, up to 190 pounds. For river running the 85 is fine at 220, but much wetter than the 91 in the pre aluminum mold. Try the new 85 - the bow rises higher than my new 91 so it could be dryer; you will catch rocks on the edges on low water creeking in the 85
My experience and 2 cents
Post Reply