Yes and no, glass-vinylester moulds tend to suffer from degassing, resulting in small bubbles which can weaken the plastic, and because fibreglass has low thermal conductivity and low thermal mass, it makes controling were the plastic goes more about the skill of the moulder, whereas an alu mould can have fins and variable wall thicknesses to control the amount of heat going to/coming off from different parts of the mould.griffen_williams wrote:Are fiberglass molds for PE boats cost effective? How many boats can you pop out before you have to make a new mold? Average Cost?
Wouldnt it be possible to make more boats like Blackfly(Jeremy) does instead of dealing with all of the crazy high cost of mold tooling?
What next?
Moderators: kenneth, sbroam, TheKrikkitWars, Mike W., Sir Adam, KNeal, PAC, adamin
- TheKrikkitWars
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:27 am
- Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: What next?
Joshua Kelly - "More George Smiley than James Bond"
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
-
- BlackFly Canoes
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:54 pm
- Location: New Hampton, NH
- Contact:
Re: What next?
That hasn't been my experience.TheKrikkitWars wrote: Yes and no, glass-vinylester moulds tend to suffer from degassing, resulting in small bubbles which can weaken the plastic, and because fibreglass has low thermal conductivity and low thermal mass, it makes controling were the plastic goes more about the skill of the moulder, whereas an alu mould can have fins and variable wall thicknesses to control the amount of heat going to/coming off from different parts of the mould.
-
- C Maven
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Northern California
- TheKrikkitWars
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:27 am
- Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: What next?
That's from my discussion of the reasoning that Big Dog had for choosing to tool the force turret in aluminium when they're unlikely to get massive demand; and my discussions with other people involved in plastics technology about the moulding process.RodeoClown wrote:That hasn't been my experience.TheKrikkitWars wrote: Yes and no, glass-vinylester moulds tend to suffer from degassing, resulting in small bubbles which can weaken the plastic, and because fibreglass has low thermal conductivity and low thermal mass, it makes controling were the plastic goes more about the skill of the moulder, whereas an alu mould can have fins and variable wall thicknesses to control the amount of heat going to/coming off from different parts of the mould.
What would you say your experience has been of fibreglass moulds? What issues did you find and how did you/your contractors address them?
Joshua Kelly - "More George Smiley than James Bond"
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
-
- BlackFly Canoes
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:54 pm
- Location: New Hampton, NH
- Contact:
Re: What next?
My experience is that it's tough to get good cosmetics, but the boats so far have proven to be plenty tough (I've got some dents on the hull of my Blackfly from hitting rebar). Also remember that the Quakes and Skeeters were out of glass molds.
As far as specific issues and solutions... that's proprietary information.
As far as specific issues and solutions... that's proprietary information.
- TheKrikkitWars
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:27 am
- Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: What next?
I suppose that Open Canoes don't have to be open with a small "o".RodeoClown wrote:As far as specific issues and solutions... that's proprietary information.
Joshua Kelly - "More George Smiley than James Bond"
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
CBoats Moderator - Not necessarily representing the CBoats staff though...(I'll use words like "moderator", "We" and "CBoats" to make it clear when I am)
- Craig Smerda
- L'Edge Designer
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 3:59 am
- Location: WaUSAu Wisconsin USA North America Earth, etc.
Re: What next?
the main reason to utilize an aluminum mold is for uniform consistency and the likelihood that high numbers of boats will be made with low maintenence or replacement costs of the mold. I've heard at one time Dagger was cooking one of up to three RPM molds full time during that boats heyday.
that said... Savage, Robson and even Dagger use/used composite molds for rotomolding and did a great job with them... but they did not sell thousands of the boats from those molds. to my knowledge if done properly a manufacturer *might* get 100 good boats from one composite mold. then they'd have to make another one... and another one... and so on.
to his credit and noted with my admiration Jeremy has designed his own boats, made his own plugs, built his own molds and manufactured and marketed his own plastic boats. he's literally a one man show... and I applaud him for it. how many people could do or have done that? not many that I know of.
so... there ya' go
do I need to change the title of this thread to something more like "let's talk about manufacturing new canoes"... or do we want to get back to "I think the future of ww-canoe designs needs to head to XYZ place..."???
or... maybe everyone is just fully satisfied with all of the canoes we already have out there and you don't think we need anymore new designs for another 5 or 6 years.
that said... Savage, Robson and even Dagger use/used composite molds for rotomolding and did a great job with them... but they did not sell thousands of the boats from those molds. to my knowledge if done properly a manufacturer *might* get 100 good boats from one composite mold. then they'd have to make another one... and another one... and so on.
to his credit and noted with my admiration Jeremy has designed his own boats, made his own plugs, built his own molds and manufactured and marketed his own plastic boats. he's literally a one man show... and I applaud him for it. how many people could do or have done that? not many that I know of.
so... there ya' go
do I need to change the title of this thread to something more like "let's talk about manufacturing new canoes"... or do we want to get back to "I think the future of ww-canoe designs needs to head to XYZ place..."???
or... maybe everyone is just fully satisfied with all of the canoes we already have out there and you don't think we need anymore new designs for another 5 or 6 years.
Esquif Canoes Paddler-Designer-Shape Shifter
Re: What next?
i think we (or i) need a new playboat c1. kind of old-school long and slicey, wavesport forplay-ish, but perhaps a bit more stable. and also available in composite. i'd buy that.
Joe
Re: What next?
Both the Skeeter and Superfly were from fiberglass molds, (as were the first Sauvage Spanish Flys) basically two layers of 1 oz. mat and isothalic (tooling) polyester resin. The trick was to get uniform thickness. I can't remember how many Superflys we made but the Skeeter mold cooked over 200. I added aluminum powder to the resin of the Superfly mold which helped tremendously in getting more uniform plastic thickness as well as adding durability. It took about three runs through the oven to drive all free styrene out of the mold and eliminate the off-gasing.
Now back to your regularly scheduled discussion.
Now back to your regularly scheduled discussion.
BrownDog Boats- "Bring the Dog"
- Mike W.
- CBoats.net Staff
- Posts: 2206
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 10:52 pm
- Location: Roanoke Rapids, NC
- Contact:
Re: What next?
You mean the Sith? Call Shaggy, they'll build you one.gumpy wrote:i think we (or i) need a new playboat c1. kind of old-school long and slicey, wavesport forplay-ish, but perhaps a bit more stable. and also available in composite. i'd buy that.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:16 am
Re: What next?
How about a smaller, agile, much lighter, still forgiving canoe designed specifically with the small female paddler in mind? For those of us that love the l'edge..... but feel lost inside of it.
-
- BlackFly Canoes
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:54 pm
- Location: New Hampton, NH
- Contact:
Re: What next?
anybody want to suggest an Ion?eddyflower wrote:How about a smaller, agile, much lighter, still forgiving canoe designed specifically with the small female paddler in mind? For those of us that love the l'edge..... but feel lost inside of it.
-
- C Guru
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:40 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: What next?
note she said MUCH lighter... maybe a royalex ion or option... maybe that might be a viable option for people who don't run crazy steep creeks, and mainly stick to class 3-4, but still want the playfulness/stability/maneuverability of those boats, in a lighter version.RodeoClown wrote:anybody want to suggest an Ion?eddyflower wrote:How about a smaller, agile, much lighter, still forgiving canoe designed specifically with the small female paddler in mind? For those of us that love the l'edge..... but feel lost inside of it.
Mohawk... Esquif... are you listening? partnership opportunity with Jeremy, maybe?
Re: What next?
An ultralight canoe would be great. To be honest it would be real hard to invest the money into building a mold and doing what it would take to get into production to sale 8 boats. With the min. order and price of royalex don't hold your breath. Simple math says it will not pay for itself much less pay any bills.
Richard Guin
Lazy good for nothing slacker
Lazy good for nothing slacker